Many women have become the mother've come a hard time with the return to work. The point is that in the generation between 20 and 40, ie in the period in which most women decide to have children, often only temporary contracts are possible. Perhaps lawyers and doctors are an exception, but in most professions, whether in a social, cultural or even journalistic environment, the common practice. This usually leads to dramatic discrimination against mothers or parents, according to the professional world.
It is not a only to flexible working hours by law . For flexible working hours can only sue those who really are permanent. By contrast, many parents, mostly mothers who are employed on temporary contracts. In practice, this will look like this. The mothers are set during her pregnancy under pressure to take the shortest possible time out for example with the argument that there could be no organized parental representation for a longer period. Parents can extend time also be difficult. Layoffs in the time parents are not uncommon. Then in the end the following notice on the - possibly very bad - working hours, which had been so contracted before pregnancy. Action serves no purpose since there is a threat not to renew the employment contract. For example, all have remained silent.
applications from women seems particularly desirable not agree so completely. This is the real problem in reconciling work and family life, for it to be called career career child and not despite child. It's not about less money to have when you get children. The idea is again to participate in working life and to be able to still time for his children.
parents who want to take care of in a reasonable amount for their children to be in employment through temporary employment contracts extremely disadvantage because the law is being circumvented by intimidation. So far both seem to politicians of all political groups and the media, the social explosiveness of that common employer practice have not yet realized.
0 comments:
Post a Comment